top of page
Search

New research on environmental sustainability of various disposition options

zorrbandito
Sep 13
1 min read

Ranked by their environmental impact, from positive (good for Nature) to negative (bad for Nature), popular methods of disposition are unsustainable from a natural capital perspective.


Coffin burials pollute the soil, while gas cremators produce an average of 245 kilograms of carbon dioxide emission per body.


In response, sustainable alternatives such as natural burials, alkaline hydrolysis, and human composting have (re)emerged. With sustainability defined as the substitution of human capital with natural capital, this research reviews 14 final disposition methods and rank them from most to least sustainable.


YES, HUMAN COMPOSTING is ranked second behind Tibetan Sky Burials (Vultures). Human composting really is a the best option for returning your body to nature, at the very end of life, becoming part of the cycle and circle of life.


Article expected to be published in Mortality soon.



 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Dead Weight - TLDR version

The report 'Dead Weight' is a 6 page report on the need for a new option to be available in Australia for human body disposition.... it discusses the problem (a fossil-fueled finale), the environmenta

 
 
 
TerraCon 2025

This year I attended (in person) the second annual global conference dedicated to Human Composting, also known as Terramation and Natural...

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page